Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mg's avatar

I think the key thing here is to consider how you use the stock.

Nobody forces you to hold the stock to the decision.

But the 10+ instances of these situations tells you retail investors will price in a good percentage of the claim.

You can get on the bus and get off before the terminal station.

Also this is linked to gold which is a very hot sector. The claim was calculated when gold broke 3000 usd. If gold stays high as noted there will be an upward revaluation in the claim. Also gold bugs will have made alot of money and will broaden their definition of what is a gold investment.

Remember the claim is based on the value of a working tier1 gold asset. People do not know this because it does not physically exist. But the arbitration panel will consider valuing this as mine ( or royalty on a mine)

When u tell gold bugs there is an 8m oz deposit at 2g per ton ( 2x global average for gold deposits) trading today at an implied value of 10usd an oz in today's price. They will buy.

A high grade deposit like this has an all in Sustaining Cost that is sub 1000 usd. With gold at 4000 usd the operating margins are huge.

Mg's avatar

Some other key things about the case. This is from company news.

We actually took india to local court and the asset was frozen. At this point india made an agreement with us and presented it. On the back of this we ceased local proceedings. We did our part, india did not

"Subsequent to these court protections being granted, the JV and the GoR have agreed to proceed to the granting of a Prospecting Licence ("PL") over 21.07km2 of the original RP area. The relevant PL area was demarcated in the field by representatives of the JV and the Department of Mines and Geology, Rajasthan ("DMG"). As part of this negotiation, the JV agreed to drop all pending court cases"

Comment by ceo stating how important documenting the agreement is.

Geoff Stanley, Chief Executive Officer of Panthera Resources, commented:

"This step towards the granting of the JV's PL and the associated Court Order is of utmost importance. It recognises and records the recent agreement between the GoR and the JV regarding the granting of our PL and puts the mandate on the GoR to take action in respect of the PL application within three months. This positive legal outcome is complimented by the constructive dialogue and understanding that has been reached with key members of the GoR and other key organisations involved in the approvals process."

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/significant-step-towards-grant-of-bhukia-pl-4ta38asqibhpfu5.html

15 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?